Energizer’s AA MAX Batteries
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
Energizer AA MAX Batteries
Case Name (Date)
Skylar et al v. Energizer Brands, LLC
20-cv-6216, E.D.N.Y.
(Dec. 2020)
Product/Service
Energizer AA MAX batteries
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
The Latest
‘Complimentary Bottle’ of Nugenix Total-T
Promotion for purported testosterone booster has some hard-to-believe claims.
OnPassive’s FIFA World Cup Sponsor Claims
Adidas, Coca-Cola, Visa and … OnPassive?
The FTC Needs to Update Its Endorsement Guides
TINA.org submits comment to FTC urging further revisions to stay relevant and effective.
Warby Parker Has Exclamation Points!
As seen this past week in Connecticut…!!!
Period Tracker Capitalizes on Post-Roe Fears
Stardust marketing claims out of this world