Energizer Max Power Bank
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing portable chargers as 10,000 mAh
Energizer AA MAX Batteries
Case Name (Date)
Skylar et al v. Energizer Brands, LLC
20-cv-6216, E.D.N.Y.
(Dec. 2020)
Product/Service
Energizer AA MAX batteries
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Energizer’s AA MAX Batteries
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
The Latest
TINA.org Joins Consumer Advocates to Keep FTC Bipartisan
Why agency independence is in the best interests of consumers.
Tracksmith’s ‘100 Mile Guarantee’
What exactly does this running brand mean by “your return is on us”?
AriZona Blueberry White Tea: ‘100% Natural White Tea’
Be wary of “natural” claims.
CATrends: ‘Daily Fantasy Sports’
Lawsuits throw the red flag on a number of DFS platforms.
Viator’s Free Cancellation Claims
This is not a sitewide perk.