Energizer’s AA MAX Batteries
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
Energizer AA MAX Batteries
Case Name (Date)
Skylar et al v. Energizer Brands, LLC
20-cv-6216, E.D.N.Y.
(Dec. 2020)
Product/Service
Energizer AA MAX batteries
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
The Latest
LegXercise Pro
Device maker does not have the clinical proof to back up its clinically proven claims.
Fighting Back Against Fake Reviews
TINA.org files comment in support of proposed rulemaking proceeding.
Crypto.com
Ad regulator bans Facebook ad for failing to disclose risks of investing in NFTs.
‘Clean at Sephora’ Label
Lawsuit alleges cosmetics marketed as ‘clean’ contain dirty ingredients.
Deceptive Ad Trends to Be Wary of in 2023
And the regulatory efforts that seek to curb them.