Energizer’s AA MAX Batteries
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
Energizer Max Power Bank
Case Name (Date)
Mentzer et al. v. Energizer Brands, LLC
23-cv-2028, C.D. Ill.
(Feb. 2023)
Product/Service
Energizer Max Power Bank
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing portable chargers as 10,000 mAh when the actual charge capacity is only 6,000 to 6,600 mAh
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Energizer AA MAX Batteries
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
The Latest
Nike: Rip The Script
It was all going to plan until footballer’s instincts took over.
Did Timothée Chalamet Just Take a Dig at Deceptive Marketing?
Why I’m a fan of this Adidas World Cup ad.
‘Bet Now’: How Wagering Apps’ Push Notification Ads Bombard Consumers
TINA.org joins petition urging FTC to require consent and opt-out for gambling marketing.
Does Gatorade ‘Hydrate Better than Water’?
Lawsuits takes aim at sports drinks’ superior hydration claim.
Phoebe Gates’s Startup Phia Was Just Accused of ‘Cookie Stuffing.’ Here’s What Happens Next
Esther Lian, Inc.com