Energizer’s AA MAX Batteries
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
Energizer Max Power Bank
Case Name (Date)
Mentzer et al. v. Energizer Brands, LLC
23-cv-2028, C.D. Ill.
(Feb. 2023)
Product/Service
Energizer Max Power Bank
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing portable chargers as 10,000 mAh when the actual charge capacity is only 6,000 to 6,600 mAh
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Energizer AA MAX Batteries
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
The Latest
Monetizing Minors
How brands exploit kid influencers and their followers.
Keppal’s Made in USA Claims
TINA.org digs into online retailer’s U.S.-origin claims following consumer tip.
Carvana’s ‘7-Day Money-Back Guarantee’
Is it still a money-back guarantee if you end up paying hundreds of dollars?
CATrends: Nutriwashing
Lawsuits allege foods and beverages aren’t as healthy as you might think.
U-Haul Uses ‘Bait-and-Switch’ Advertising, According to Investigation by Watchdog Group
Herb Weisbaum, The ConsumerMan, Consumers’ Checkbook