Energizer’s AA MAX Batteries
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
Energizer Max Power Bank
Case Name (Date)
Mentzer et al. v. Energizer Brands, LLC
23-cv-2028, C.D. Ill.
(Feb. 2023)
Product/Service
Energizer Max Power Bank
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing portable chargers as 10,000 mAh when the actual charge capacity is only 6,000 to 6,600 mAh
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Energizer AA MAX Batteries
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
The Latest
Wonder Hoodie’s ‘Bulletproof’ Clothing
Does this company have the ammunition to support its bulletproof claims?
Best Reader Tips of 2024
Consumer complaints worth remembering.
Optics Outfitter
Why this eyewear company’s advertised “starting” prices may not be 20/20.
Court Order Forces Prevagen to Scrub Memory-Improvement Claims
MADISON, CONN. Dec. 12, 2024— In a win for consumers, a court has ordered Quincy Bioscience to stop advertising Prevagen using memory-improvement claims. This follows a near-decade-long campaign by the…
Prevagen Scrubs Memory-Improvement Claims Following Court Order
What led up to brain supplement’s December to remember.