Energizer Max Power Bank
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing portable chargers as 10,000 mAh
Energizer’s AA MAX Batteries
Case Name (Date)
Millam et al v. Energizer Holdings, Inc. et al
21-cv-1500, C.D. Cal.
(Sept. 2021)
Product/Service
Energizer’s AA MAX batteries
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Energizer AA MAX Batteries
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
The Latest
‘Bet Now’: How Wagering Apps’ Push Notification Ads Bombard Consumers
TINA.org joins petition urging FTC to require consent and opt-out for gambling marketing.
Does Gatorade ‘Hydrate Better than Water’?
Lawsuits takes aim at sports drinks’ superior hydration claim.
Phoebe Gates’s Startup Phia Was Just Accused of ‘Cookie Stuffing.’ Here’s What Happens Next
Esther Lian, Inc.com
Airport Retailers Can Now Charge an Employee Benefits Fee—but It May Not Go to Workers
Georgia Fearn, Inc.com
CATrends: False HEPA Claims
Lawsuits attempt to clear the air.