Energizer Max Power Bank
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing portable chargers as 10,000 mAh
Energizer’s AA MAX Batteries
Case Name (Date)
Millam et al v. Energizer Holdings, Inc. et al
21-cv-1500, C.D. Cal.
(Sept. 2021)
Product/Service
Energizer’s AA MAX batteries
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Energizer AA MAX Batteries
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
The Latest
NJ tax dollars spent on ‘Blue Ribbon’ school awards that critics call deceptive
Julie O’Connor, Nj Spotlight News
The Regulatory Loopholes Behind Prevagen’s Rise
Sara Talpos, Med Shadow
CATrends: Tequilas Marketed as 100% Agave
Ingredient claims come into the limelight.
Jimmy Dean Breakfast Burritos
Beware of food images wrapped in deception.
The FTC is not anti-direct selling. It’s pro-truth in advertising.
The DSA misses the mark.