Energizer Max Power Bank
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing portable chargers as 10,000 mAh
Energizer’s AA MAX Batteries
Case Name (Date)
Millam et al v. Energizer Holdings, Inc. et al
21-cv-1500, C.D. Cal.
(Sept. 2021)
Product/Service
Energizer’s AA MAX batteries
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Energizer AA MAX Batteries
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
The Latest
FTC, Nevada Sue IM Mastery Academy
Complaint alleges IML was a $1.2 billion scam.
OmegaXL: Backed by Research
What you should know about ingredient studies.
Make Money with Fran/Passive Digital Mastery
Will master resell rights actually give you the dream life?
Tesla Faces Criticism Over ‘Made In USA’ Claims
Tanya Gazdik, Media Post
Relivira
Underwear seller strips a number of marketing claims after a TINA.org inquiry.