Energizer Max Power Bank
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing portable chargers as 10,000 mAh
Energizer’s AA MAX Batteries
Case Name (Date)
Millam et al v. Energizer Holdings, Inc. et al
21-cv-1500, C.D. Cal.
(Sept. 2021)
Product/Service
Energizer’s AA MAX batteries
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Energizer AA MAX Batteries
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
The Latest
TINA.org Supports FTC’s Settlement with TruHeight
Comment pushes for strong oversight of supplement companies targeting kids.
Legacy Cremation Services Violating Federal Court Order
TINA.org complaint with FTC and DOJ urges renewed action to stop serial offender.
Legacy Cremation Services Brazenly Violating Federal Court Order
MADISON, CONN. May 12, 2026 – Legacy Cremation Services continues to prey on grieving families nationwide despite a federal court order intended to stop its deceptive practices, according to a…
Garden & Gather’s ‘100% Money Back Guarantee’ and ‘Free Returns’
Consumers’ attempts to obtain a full refund may only yield a meager harvest.
New York City is Taking on Shady Subscriptions
And TINA.org is all for it.