
DG Health Maximum Strength Lidocaine Pain Relief Gel Patch
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing lidocaine pain relief patches
Button et al. v. Dollar General Corp. et al.
22-cv-7028, D.N.J.
(Oct. 2022)
Merchandise at Dollar General stores
Charging consumers more than the price advertised on store shelves
Pending
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing lidocaine pain relief patches
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the ingredients in Clover Valley Honey Graham Crackers
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the ingredients in Fudge Mint Cookies
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing infants’ medicine as different than children’s medicine when both contain the same amount of the same active ingredient
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the ingredients in graham crackers
Allegations: Products do not make the number of cups advertised on the labels
February 2018: This case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed. December 2016: A class-action…
In May and June 2017, class-action lawsuits was filed against Dollar General for allegedly deceptively marketing DG Auto motor oil by placing obsolete motor oils next to other brand-name motor…
June 2016: Some of the lawsuits filed against Dollar General were transferred to a court in Missouri to be heard together. To read Dollar General’s motion to transfer the lawsuits,…
Consumers complain about higher prices at checkout.
Plaintiffs allege packaging misrepresents lidocaine dosages as ‘maximum strength,’ among other things.
Lawsuits claim infant-specific products aren’t any different than acetaminophen medications for older children.