Dollar General
Allegations: Charging consumers more than the advertised prices
Wright et al. v. Dollar General Corp.
23-cv-646, N.D.N.Y.
(May 2023)
DG Health Maximum Strength Lidocaine Pain Relief Gel Patch
Misleadingly marketing that patches last up to 12 hours when they do not stay on that long
Misleadingly marketing patches as “Maximum Strength” when other products deliver more lidocaine
Misleadingly marketing that patches provide “numbing relief” without FDA approval to make such claims
Pending
Allegations: Charging consumers more than the advertised prices
Allegations: Charging consumers more than the price advertised on store shelves
Allegations: Deceptively marketing motor oils
Allegations: Deceptively marketing motor oils
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing lidocaine pain relief patches
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the ingredients in Clover Valley Honey Graham Crackers
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the ingredients in Fudge Mint Cookies
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing infants’ medicine as different than children’s medicine when both contain the same amount of the same active ingredient
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the ingredients in graham crackers
Allegations: Products do not make the number of cups advertised on the labels
February 2018: This case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed. December 2016: A class-action…
Consumers complain about higher prices at checkout.
Plaintiffs allege packaging misrepresents lidocaine dosages as ‘maximum strength,’ among other things.
Lawsuits claim infant-specific products aren’t any different than acetaminophen medications for older children.