
Disney Aulani
Allegations: Falsely marketing that facilities are safe for families of all ages without disclosing that surfaces in the pool area are excessively slippery
Scott et al. v. Disney Platform Distribution, Inc.
25-cv-638, C.D. Cal.
(March 2025)
Disney subscriptions
Failing to adequately disclose the terms of subscriptions and making it difficult to cancel
Pending
Allegations: Falsely marketing that facilities are safe for families of all ages without disclosing that surfaces in the pool area are excessively slippery
Allegations: Falsely marketing that there would be “no blockout dates” for Dream Key passholders when such claims are not true
Allegations: Misrepresenting that the passes are not subject to any “blockout” dates when there are days and times that the passes cannot be used
Allegations: Failing to adequately disclose the terms of subscriptions
Here’s how much you need to deposit – and wager – in order to get $1,000 of real money.
Cable-sports giant faults in its marketing of streaming service.
“May the fourth” of distinguishing between organic content and paid advertising be with you.
Instant replay shows six instances in which Super Bowl 52 advertisers have fumbled ad claims.
It’s game over for non-cable subscribers.