Sale Prices at Carter’s and OshKosh B’gosh
Allegations: Falsely advertising discounts off of artificially inflated regular prices
March 2016: The named plaintiff voluntarily dismissed this action When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.. The reasons for the dismissal have not been disclosed.
February 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Carter’s, Inc. and OshKosh B’gosh, Inc. for allegedly falsely advertising discounts by comparing sale prices to false market prices. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the market prices were artificially inflated and were never the original prices for products. In addition, the market prices were not the prevailing market price within the three months immediately before the advertisement, as required by California law. (Morrow et al v. Carter’s, Inc., The William Carter Company, Carter’s Retail, Inc., OshKosh B’gosh, Inc. and Does 1-50, Case No. 16-cv-345, S. D. CA.)
For more information about misleadingly advertised discounts and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
Allegations: Falsely advertising discounts off of artificially inflated regular prices
Allegations: Falsely advertising discounts off of artificially inflated “original” prices
Company’s animal welfare claims – and brand name – face increasing scrutiny.
Consumers balk at hidden junk fees.
As years pass and life shifts, the walls around us quietly hold every moment.
TINA.org uncovers the limits of this carrier’s “unlimited” data plans.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.