Dollar General
Allegations: Charging consumers more than the advertised prices
Hodorovych et al. v. Dollar General Corp.
22-cv-3415, N.D. Ill.
(June 2022)
DG Health Maximum Strength Lidocaine Pain Relief Gel Patch
Misleadingly marketing that products last up to 12 hours when they regularly peel off within a few hours or minutes of being applied
Misleadingly marketing patches as “Maximum Strength” when they do not stay on for the advertised period of time and, as a result, do not provide the promised relief
Falsely marketing that products provide “Numbing Relief” when patches are not capable of providing such relief
Pending
Allegations: Charging consumers more than the advertised prices
Allegations: Charging consumers more than the price advertised on store shelves
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing lidocaine pain relief patches
Allegations: Deceptively marketing motor oils
Allegations: Deceptively marketing motor oils
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the ingredients in Clover Valley Honey Graham Crackers
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the ingredients in Fudge Mint Cookies
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing infants’ medicine as different than children’s medicine when both contain the same amount of the same active ingredient
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the ingredients in graham crackers
Allegations: Products do not make the number of cups advertised on the labels
February 2018: This case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed. December 2016: A class-action…
Consumers complain about higher prices at checkout.
Plaintiffs allege packaging misrepresents lidocaine dosages as ‘maximum strength,’ among other things.
Lawsuits claim infant-specific products aren’t any different than acetaminophen medications for older children.