Derma E Skincare Products
October 2018: This case was voluntarily dismissed because the parties reached a settlement agreement, the terms of which have not been disclosed.
April 2018: Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint similarly alleging that Derma E® misleadingly markets skincare products as natural when, according to plaintiffs, they actually contain synthetic, artificial, and non-natural ingredients.
October 2016: This case was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 16-cv-7735, S. D. NY.)
August 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Derma E® for allegedly misleadingly marketing its skincare products – including lotions, scrubs, and cleansers – as natural when, according to plaintiffs, they contain synthetic ingredients. (Petrosino et al v. Stearn’s Products, Inc. d/b/a Derma E®, Case No. 2016-52186, Supreme Court of New York – County of Dutchess)
Class-Action Tracker
The Latest
Pencils Down: Princeton Review Revises Marketing following TINA.org Investigation
SAT test prep company comes clean about its money-back guarantee.
Nutrafol Needs to Shed Its Deceptive Hair Growth Claims
Illegal claims that company’s products prevent hair loss also need to go.
Regulators Act on TINA.org’s Complaint Against Rihanna’s Savage X Fenty
MADISON, CONN. December 1, 2022 – Acting on a complaint filed by ad watchdog, truthinadvertising.org (TINA.org), California regulators have reached a settlement with lingerie company Savage X Fenty, originally a joint venture between…
Tom Brady and Other Celebrity Endorsers Face Lawsuits over FTX Ads
Complaints allege violations of state securities laws.
Deceptive Marketing by Rihanna’s Savage X Fenty Put to Bed in California
Lingerie company agrees to pay $1.2 million to settle lawsuit