
“COMPARE AT” Prices at T.J. Maxx Stores
In July 2018, a class-action lawsuit was filed against T.J. Maxx stores for allegedly deceptively advertising “phantom markdown[s]” on merchandise by comparing a higher, fictional “COMPARE AT” price to the lower sale price. According to the plaintiffs, the store uses the “COMPARE AT” prices to mislead consumers into believing they are purchasing merchandise at a discount and that the merchandise is of a higher quality than it actually is. (Fuentes et al v. TJX Companies, Inc. d/b/a T.J. Maxx stores, Case No. 18-cv-22767, S.D. Fla.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of fictitious pricing, click here.
Class-Action Tracker


“Deep Discounts” at T.J. Maxx Stores

Discounts at T.J. Maxx

Thread Counts of Linens at T. J. Maxx

Thread Count of Cotton Bed Linens

Discounts at Marshalls Stores

Discounts at HomeGoods
The Latest

Williams-Sonoma’s Halloween Slice & Bake Cookies
Some colorful ingredients undermine specialty retailer’s “all-natural” claim.

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines’ CO2ZERO Carbon Offset Program
Lawsuit and environmental groups accuse Dutch airline of greenwashing.

‘Complimentary Bottle’ of Nugenix Total-T
Promotion for purported testosterone booster has some hard-to-believe claims.

OnPassive’s FIFA World Cup Sponsor Claims
Adidas, Coca-Cola, Visa and … OnPassive?

The FTC Needs to Update Its Endorsement Guides
TINA.org submits comment to FTC urging further revisions to stay relevant and effective.