Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
Chicco Car Seats
Case Name (Date)
Seidl et al. v. Chicco USA, Inc.
22-cv-2586, E.D. Penn.
(July 2022)
Product/Service
Certain Chicco car seats
Allegations
Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals, such as flame retardants and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which have been linked to several health issues
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds, having been side-impact tested, and providing protection in side-impact collisions when such claims are not true
The Latest
Sweet Suspicion: A Waitrose Mystery
A Waitrose Mystery: A family Christmas takes an unexpected turn in this tale of mystery, intrigue… and pudding.
Optics Outfitter
Why this eyewear company’s advertised “starting” prices may not be 20/20.
Court Order Forces Prevagen to Scrub Memory-Improvement Claims
MADISON, CONN. Dec. 12, 2024— In a win for consumers, a court has ordered Quincy Bioscience to stop advertising Prevagen using memory-improvement claims. This follows a near-decade-long campaign by the…
Prevagen Scrubs Memory-Improvement Claims Following Court Order
What led up to brain supplement’s December to remember.
The Perimenopause Gold Rush
Jessica Bennett, The Cut