Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
Chicco Car Seats
Case Name (Date)
Seidl et al. v. Chicco USA, Inc.
22-cv-2586, E.D. Penn.
(July 2022)
Product/Service
Certain Chicco car seats
Allegations
Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals, such as flame retardants and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which have been linked to several health issues
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds, having been side-impact tested, and providing protection in side-impact collisions when such claims are not true
The Latest
The McRib
Lawsuit alleges the McRib is a McScam.
2026 Deceptive Ad Trends
A closer look at what we’ll be monitoring in the new year.
Why ‘Click-to-Cancel’ Still Matters – and Why the FTC Should Try Again
The problem hasn’t gone away.
Amazon’s Great Holiday Climb
Why parents may need to be called in to this Roblox game rated 13+.
Interior Icons’ 10-Year Warranty and 365-Day Returns
Taking advantage of these perks may be harder than advertised.