Blue Diamond Smokehouse Almonds

Case Name (Date)

Clark et al. v. Blue Diamond Growers
22-cv-1591, N.D. Ill.
(March 2022)

Cummings et al. v. Blue Diamond Growers
22-cv-141, N.D. Fla.
(June 2022)

Product/Service

Allegations

Misleadingly marketing products as “smokehouse” when they are not made in a smokehouse and the flavor comes from added liquid smoke flavoring

Status

Clark case: Pending

Cummings case: Dismissed

Class-Action Tracker

Blue Diamond Smokehouse Almonds

Class Action

Blue Diamond Smokehouse Almonds

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that the flavor in products comes from being smoked over a fire of wood chips

Blue Diamond Smokehouse Almonds

Class Action

Blue Diamond Smokehouse Almonds

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as “Smokehouse Almonds”

Blue Diamond Smokehouse Almonds

Class Action

Blue Diamond Smokehouse Almonds

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as “smokehouse”

Blue Diamond Habanero BBQ Almonds

Class Action

Blue Diamond Habanero BBQ Almonds

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that one of the characterizing flavors in products comes from habanero chili peppers when they contain a relatively small amounts of the ingredient

Almond Breeze Almondmilk Vanilla Yogurt Alternative

Class Action

Almond Breeze Almondmilk Vanilla Yogurt Alternative

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing yogurt as “vanilla with other natural flavors” when the ingredients list shows that the product contains more “Natural Flavors” than vanilla extract

Almond Breeze Vanilla Almondmilk

Class Action

Almond Breeze Vanilla Almondmilk

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as containing vanilla when the ingredient list does not include vanilla but rather discloses that the products contain unspecified “Natural Flavor”

Almond Breeze Almond Coconut Blend