Blue Diamond Smokehouse Almonds

Case Name (Date)

Colpitts et al v. Blue Diamond Growers
20-cv-2487, S.D.N.Y.
(March 2020)

Product/Service

Blue Diamond Growers Smokehouse Almonds

Allegations

Misleadingly marketing that the flavor in products comes from being smoked over a fire of wood chips when the smoke flavor comes from an added ingredient (“Natural Hickory Smoke Flavor”)

Status

Summary judgment granted in favor of Blue Diamond Growers

Class-Action Tracker

Blue Diamond Smokehouse Almonds

Class Action

Blue Diamond Smokehouse Almonds

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as “Smokehouse Almonds”

Blue Diamond Smokehouse Almonds

Class Action

Blue Diamond Smokehouse Almonds

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as “smokehouse”

Blue Diamond Smokehouse Almonds

Class Action

Blue Diamond Smokehouse Almonds

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as “smokehouse”

Blue Diamond Habanero BBQ Almonds

Class Action

Blue Diamond Habanero BBQ Almonds

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that one of the characterizing flavors in products comes from habanero chili peppers when they contain a relatively small amounts of the ingredient

Almond Breeze Almondmilk Vanilla Yogurt Alternative

Class Action

Almond Breeze Almondmilk Vanilla Yogurt Alternative

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing yogurt as “vanilla with other natural flavors” when the ingredients list shows that the product contains more “Natural Flavors” than vanilla extract

Almond Breeze Vanilla Almondmilk

Class Action

Almond Breeze Vanilla Almondmilk

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as containing vanilla when the ingredient list does not include vanilla but rather discloses that the products contain unspecified “Natural Flavor”

Almond Breeze Almond Coconut Blend