
Blue Diamond Smokehouse Almonds
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that the flavor in products comes from being smoked over a fire of wood chips
Jeska et al. v. Blue Diamond Growers
24-cv-677, D. Conn.
(April 2024)
Mann et al. v. Blue Diamond Growers
24-cv-114, W.D. Penn.
(Jan. 2024)
Blue Diamond Smokehouse Almonds
Misleadingly marketing products as “Smokehouse Almonds” when they were not made in a smokehouse and the smoke taste comes from an added liquid smoke flavoring ingredient
Jeska case: Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
Mann case: Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that the flavor in products comes from being smoked over a fire of wood chips
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as “smokehouse”
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as “smokehouse”
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that one of the characterizing flavors in products comes from habanero chili peppers when they contain a relatively small amounts of the ingredient
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing yogurt as “vanilla with other natural flavors” when the ingredients list shows that the product contains more “Natural Flavors” than vanilla extract
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as containing vanilla when the ingredient list does not include vanilla but rather discloses that the products contain unspecified “Natural Flavor”
TINA.org is currently tracking 70 class actions challenging claims that a variety of foods and beverages are truly vanilla.
And it’s a hearty fee that food manufacturers pay for the right to display the AHA’s heart-check mark.
How much of the featured ingredients are really in these foods?