Babyganics SPF 50+ Sunscreens
December 2017: This case was stayed pending a nationwide settlement in a related case, Mayhew v. KAS Direct and S. C. Johnson & Son.
October 2017: The claims against VMG Partners were dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed. The claims against S. C. Johnson & Son remain pending.
August 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against S. C. Johnson & Son and VMG Partners for allegedly falsely advertising babyganics mineral-based sunscreens as being SPF 50+ when, according to plaintiffs, the SPF of the sunscreens is no more than, and sometimes much lower than, SPF 30. (Carroll et al v. S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. and VMG Partners, LLC, Case No. 17-cv-5828, N.D. Ill.)
For more information about TINA.org’s coverage of the marketing of sunscreens, click here.
Class-Action Tracker
Babyganics Bath Products
Babyganics Pre-Moistened Wipes
The Latest
Lyft
Is Lyft taking consumers for a ride with claims they can get 50 percent off their next trip?
DraftKings
The lowdown on sportsbook’s “up to” $1,000 bonus.
Punxsutawney Phil Makes TINA.org’s Wall of Shame
Falsely claiming to be the “Seer of Seers,” this misleading marmot has duped millions.
GasBuddy
Company claims to save consumers money at the pump. But there are red flags.
Dan Newlin: The Wolf of the Florida Turnpike?
Claims of large lawsuit winnings flood the highway.