Class Action

Babyganics Bath Products

July 2018: This case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. because the parties reached a settlement agreement, the terms of which have not been disclosed.

September 2017: The case was stayed pending the resolution of settlement proceedings in a similar case, Mayhew v. Babyganics.

Summer 2017: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Babyganics in 2017. The complaint, which was originally filed in June and amended in July, alleges that the company misleadingly markets its bath products as “Tear Free” and gentle for infants and children when, according to the plaintiffs, scientific evidence shows that the products contain ingredients that are eye irritants. (Skeen et al v. KAS Direct, LLC d/b/a Babyganics, Case No. 17-cv-4119, S. D. NY.)

For more of TINA.org’s coverage of Babyganics, click here.


Class-Action Tracker

Babyganics Products

Class Action

Babyganics Products

November 2018: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement. June 2018: A federal judge preliminarily approved a settlement of this lawsuit. According to the settlement terms, class…

Babyganics Pre-Moistened Wipes

Class Action

Babyganics Pre-Moistened Wipes

A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against S. C. Johnson and Babyganics in March 2017. The complaint, which was transferred to federal court in April 2017 and amended in…

Babyganics SPF 50+ Sunscreens

Class Action

Babyganics SPF 50+ Sunscreens

December 2017: This case was stayed pending a nationwide settlement in a related case, Mayhew v. KAS Direct and S. C. Johnson & Son. October 2017: The claims against VMG…


The Latest

Filters

Fisher Investments

Ad Alert

Fisher Investments

Unearthing the fees that Fisher charges but doesn’t disclose in some of its TV ads.


Show More