Babyganics Bath Products
July 2018: This case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. because the parties reached a settlement agreement, the terms of which have not been disclosed.
September 2017: The case was stayed pending the resolution of settlement proceedings in a similar case, Mayhew v. Babyganics.
Summer 2017: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Babyganics in 2017. The complaint, which was originally filed in June and amended in July, alleges that the company misleadingly markets its bath products as “Tear Free” and gentle for infants and children when, according to the plaintiffs, scientific evidence shows that the products contain ingredients that are eye irritants. (Skeen et al v. KAS Direct, LLC d/b/a Babyganics, Case No. 17-cv-4119, S. D. NY.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of Babyganics, click here.
Class-Action Tracker
Babyganics Pre-Moistened Wipes
Babyganics SPF 50+ Sunscreens
The Latest
NBA Stars’ Sneaky Alcohol Ads
These players dropped the ball in their recent offseason announcements.
Owner of FabKids, JustFab and ShoeDazzle Settles Deception Charges
Refunds for consumers duped into signing up for “VIP” memberships.
Mario Badescu’s Rosewater Facial Spray
Rosewater ingredient claims wilt upon a closer look.
Cascade ‘Free & Clear’ Dish Detergents
What does this marketing term mean?
Quality Inn & Suites (Choice Hotels)
Guests say online pictures are misleading.