
AT&T’s “Unlimited” Data Plans
Allegations: Deceptively promoting data plans as “unlimited” when they are actually subject to limitations
June 2022: The Court preliminarily approved a settlement agreement. For more information, go to https://www.attvianuclassactionsettlement.com/.
September 2021: Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint.
June 2019: A class-action lawsuit was filed against AT&T for allegedly deceptively using a bait-and-switch advertising scheme in which it advertises flat monthly rates for wireless service plans when, according to plaintiffs, the company fails to disclose certain fees and the amount customers pay each month is actually higher than advertised. (Vianu et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC, Case No. 19-cv-3602, N.D. Cal.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of AT&T, click here.
Allegations: Deceptively promoting data plans as “unlimited” when they are actually subject to limitations
Allegations: Failing to adequately disclose when customers will be charged international roaming fees
July 2020: The case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. as to the named plaintiff and When a complaint is dismissed without…
In July 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against AT&T for allegedly misleadingly representing that it does not share or sell data about customers when, according to the complaint, the…
December 2016: This action was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed. May 2016: After the…
In June 2016, a class-action lawsuit was filed against AT&T for allegedly using bait and switch tactics by advertising calling plans on the packaging of GoPhones that AT&T does not…
March 2016: The lawsuit was dismissed because the summons was not returned with proof that it was served, as required by Massachusetts law. October 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed…
Company’s puffery defense falls flat as NAD recommends changes to commercial.
Influencer gets FTC rules on disclosure wrong.
ISPs battle over who’s the real Pinocchio.
When it rains it pours.
App’s claim to stream games “anywhere” is, to use a football term, an example of blown coverage.