
Consumers Throw Flags on Super Bowl Advertisers
Six big game marketers that have been accused of fumbling ad claims.
Six big game marketers that have been accused of fumbling ad claims.
Lawsuits take aim at so-called non-disparagement clauses.
Several of this year’s Super Bowl advertisers have run into legal trouble for alleged deceptive marketing.
Five class-action settlements that left consumers behind in 2022.
A closer look at the who, what, where, when, and why.
“The bottom line is that the claims regarding corn syrup in brewing are more marketing than science.”
Instant replay shows six instances in which Super Bowl 52 advertisers have fumbled ad claims.
Margarita-flavored malt beverage may not be as low-calorie or low-carb as you think.
Behind the labels that cost you more.
TINA.org’s Big Game scorecard on companies under fire for deceptive ads.
Allegations: Preventing consumers from leaving negative reviews on its website and app
Allegations: Falsely advertising the alcohol in Ritas drinks
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that Veza Sur is a craft beer made in Miami with Latin roots when it is not a craft beer and has no authentic Latin roots and…
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that beverages are made with agave to make consumers think they contain agave spirits when the ingredients list reveals they actually contain agave syrup as a sweetener
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that beverages are made with agave to make consumers think they contain agave spirits when the ingredients list reveals they actually contain agave syrup as a sweetener
Allegations: Falsely advertising that beverages don’t contain any alcohol