Anheuser-Busch
Allegations: Preventing consumers from giving negative reviews on its website and app
In December 2014, a state judge preliminarily approved a settlement of a class-action lawsuit against Anheuser-Busch. The complaint, which was originally filed in 2013, claims that the company misleadingly markets Kirin beer as being imported from Japan without adequately disclosing that it is actually brewed in the United States.
According to the settlement terms, class members may receive a $0.50 refund for every purchase of a six-pack of 12-ounce bottles, a $1 refund for every purchase of a 12-pack of 12-ounce bottles, and a $0.10 refund for every purchase of an individual bottle or can. Class members with proof of purchase may receive a maximum refund of $50 and class members without proof of purchase may receive a maximum refund of $12.
In addition, the company agreed to stop describing the beer as imported and to prominently display the phrase “Brewed under Kirin’s strict supervision by Anheuser-Busch in Los Angeles, CA and Williamsburg, VA” on the Kirin beer labels and packaging. (Suarez et al v. Anheuser-Busch Cos. LLC, Case No. 2013-33620-CA-01, Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Anheuser-Busch and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding the misleading advertising of alcohol and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
Allegations: Preventing consumers from giving negative reviews on its website and app
Allegations: Falsely advertising the alcohol in Ritas drinks
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that Veza Sur is a craft beer made in Miami with Latin roots when it is not a craft beer and has no authentic Latin roots and…
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that beverages are made with agave to make consumers think they contain agave spirits when the ingredients list reveals they actually contain agave syrup as a sweetener
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that beverages are made with agave to make consumers think they contain agave spirits when the ingredients list reveals they actually contain agave syrup as a sweetener
Allegations: Falsely advertising that beverages don’t contain any alcohol
In September 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Anheuser-Busch for allegedly falsely advertising Ritas™ brand beverages in a way to make consumers think that the Sparkling Margarita beverages contain…
October 2016: This case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. as to the named plaintiff and When a complaint is dismissed without…
June 2013: These two cases were transferred to a multidistrict litigation (MDL) in Ohio to be heard with other similar cases. Click here to learn more about the MDL. (In…
March 2017: This case was voluntarily dismissed because the parties entered a confidential settlement agreement. The named plaintiffs’ claims were dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot…
April 2017: Plaintiffs’ petition for en banc review was denied. March 2017: The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court’s decision to dismiss the lawsuit. The appellate court…
April 2016: The appeal was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed. November 2015: An objector filed…
March 2016: The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s decision to dismiss this lawsuit. (In Re: Anheuser-Busch Beer Labeling Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, Case No. 14-3653,…
Lawsuits take aim at so-called non-disparagement clauses.
Several of this year’s Super Bowl advertisers have run into legal trouble for alleged deceptive marketing.
Five class-action settlements that left consumers behind in 2022.
A closer look at the who, what, where, when, and why.
“The bottom line is that the claims regarding corn syrup in brewing are more marketing than science.”