Gillette
A TINA.org investigation of Gillette found that the company was making the unqualified claim that its product line was made in the United States in a national marketing campaign when…
Watson et al. v. The Procter & Gamble Co. and The Gillette Co. LLC
22-cv-40010, E.D. Mass.
(Jan. 2022)
Gillette, Venus, Braun, and Oral-B products
Failing to timely disclose that warranties are conditioned upon using authorized repair services and replacement parts
Pending
A TINA.org investigation of Gillette found that the company was making the unqualified claim that its product line was made in the United States in a national marketing campaign when…
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as pure
August 2018: This case was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 18-cv-6844, C.D. Cal.) April 2018: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Procter & Gamble for allegedly misleadingly using You…
March 2016: The U.S. Supreme Court denied An order the U.S. Supreme Court issues to review a lower court’s judgment.. January 2015: TINA.org filed an amicus brief supporting a December…
October 2015: The named plaintiff dismissed this action When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.. The reasons for the dismissal have…
In March 2016, a federal judge dismissed a class-action lawsuit filed against Gillette and Procter & Gamble alleging that the marketing for Duracell AA and AAA Copper Top batteries with…
In October 2015, a federal judge dismissed a class-action lawsuit against the makers of Duracell batteries alleging, among other things, that the marketing (including TV and radio commercials, and product…
December 2014: The parties agreed to dismiss this lawsuit. The reasons for the dismissal have not yet been disclosed. September 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Procter & Gamble…
Excess product packaging collides with commitments to sustainability.
Get a load of this.
Products marketed to clear up stuffy noses and relieve sinus congestion don’t work, researchers say.
When companies green it, they better mean it.
Several products marketed as ‘non-drowsy’ contain an ingredient that causes drowsiness, lawsuits claim.