Gillette
A TINA.org investigation of Gillette found that the company was making the unqualified claim that its product line was made in the United States in a national marketing campaign when…
Watson et al. v. The Procter & Gamble Co. and The Gillette Co. LLC
22-cv-40010, E.D. Mass.
(Jan. 2022)
Gillette, Venus, Braun, and Oral-B products
Failing to timely disclose that warranties are conditioned upon using authorized repair services and replacement parts
Pending
A TINA.org investigation of Gillette found that the company was making the unqualified claim that its product line was made in the United States in a national marketing campaign when…
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as pure
August 2018: This case was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 18-cv-6844, C.D. Cal.) April 2018: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Procter & Gamble for allegedly misleadingly using You…
March 2016: The U.S. Supreme Court denied An order the U.S. Supreme Court issues to review a lower court’s judgment.. January 2015: TINA.org filed an amicus brief supporting a December…
October 2015: The named plaintiff dismissed this action When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.. The reasons for the dismissal have…
In March 2016, a federal judge dismissed a class-action lawsuit filed against Gillette and Procter & Gamble alleging that the marketing for Duracell AA and AAA Copper Top batteries with…
In October 2015, a federal judge dismissed a class-action lawsuit against the makers of Duracell batteries alleging, among other things, that the marketing (including TV and radio commercials, and product…
December 2014: The parties agreed to dismiss this lawsuit. The reasons for the dismissal have not yet been disclosed. September 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Procter & Gamble…
What consumers should know about software tethering.
The bottom line? Toothpaste tubes aren’t generally getting recycled.
See how you stack up.
An FDA panel’s recent findings has led to a flood of lawsuits.
Why is Secret making a big deal out of something that is true of all deodorants?