Rear-View Displays in Volvo Vehicles
Allegations: Marketing vehicles as safe when the rear-view camera display malfunctions and disappears
March 2020: An amended complaint adding two named plaintiffs was filed and the original named plaintiff voluntarily dismissed his claims When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
March 2018: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Volvo for allegedly misleadingly marketing that a feature in XC90 vehicles called Sensus is compatible with Android Auto (an app that allows users to control and display apps from their smartphone in the car) when, according to the complaint, the cars are not compatible with the app. (Middien et al v. Volvo Cars of North America, LLC et al, Case No. 18-cv-3760, D.N.J.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Volvo and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
Allegations: Marketing vehicles as safe when the rear-view camera display malfunctions and disappears
Allegations: Marketing that the system provides a “user-friendly interface and unparalleled connectivity” when it freezes, reboots, crashes, and fails
Can these “robot” puppies replace man’s best friend?
Can you actually work out without the work?
MADISON, CONN. Feb. 11, 2026 – A company calling itself “Patent & Trademark Office” is violating the FTC’s Impersonation Rule as well as the FTC Act by falsely posing as…
Complaint to FTC cites violations of agency’s Impersonation Rule.
TINA.org digs into shop’s purported Newport roots, and more.