Volvo 850

March 2018: A federal judge granted the company’s motion to dismiss concluding, among other things, that the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.

May 2013: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Volvo for advertising that its Volvo 850 had an innovative Side Impact Protection System (SIPS) with solid steel anti-intrusion doorbars on all four doors, when, according to the complaint, the SIPS did not exist in the rear doors. The class-action lawsuit was filed on behalf of those who have leased or owned the Volvo 850 produced in 1997. (Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint later in 2013.) (Webb et al. v. Volvo Cars of N.A., LLC et al., Case No. 13-cv-2394, E.D. Penn.)

For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Volvo and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.

Class-Action Tracker

Volvo XC90

Class Action

Volvo XC90

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing Volvo’s Sensus as compatible with the Android Auto app when it’s not

Sensus System in Volvo XC90s

Class Action

Sensus System in Volvo XC90s

In November 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Volvo for allegedly misleadingly marketing that the Sensus system in Volvo XC90s would be compatible with Android Auto, an app that…

Volvo XC90 T8

Class Action

Volvo XC90 T8

January 2019: The claims against Volvo Cars of North America were voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled., the…

Volvo’s Sensus

Class Action

Volvo’s Sensus

December 2017: This case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled., the reasons for which have not been…