In August 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Woodstream Corp. for allegedly misleadingly representing that VICTOR® and VICTOR® PESTCHASER® ultrasonic repellers will drive rodents away from homes by emitting noises that can only be heard by rodents when, according to plaintiffs, the repellers do not work as advertised and there is no scientific evidence supporting the advertising claims. (Heumann et al v. Woodstream Corp., Case No. 19-cv-1077, N.D.N.Y.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of pest repeller products, click here.
MADISON, CONN. December 1, 2022 – Acting on a complaint filed by ad watchdog, truthinadvertising.org (TINA.org), California regulators have reached a settlement with lingerie company Savage X Fenty, originally a joint venture between…
This annual heartstring-tugging tradition skates into another year.
Complaints allege violations of state securities laws.
Lingerie company agrees to pay $1.2 million to settle lawsuit
Unearthing the fees that Fisher charges but doesn’t disclose in some of its TV ads.