U-Haul Rentals
Allegations: Misleadingly representing that it safeguards consumers’ personal information when it failed to do so and there was a data breach
June 2020: This case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. because the parties reached a settlement agreement, the terms of which have not been disclosed.
May 2018: A class-action lawsuit was filed against U-Haul for allegedly falsely representing its reservation guarantee policy. Specifically, plaintiffs claim that, if a customer makes reservations and does not receive the agreed upon equipment size, location, or pick up time, U-Haul will pay the customer $50 when, according to the complaint, the company often fails to pay the $50 when the correct equipment is not available at the specified time and location. (Newman et al v. U-Haul Co. of New York and Vermont, Inc., U-Haul International, Inc., and Amerco, Case No. 18-cv-4751, S.D.N.Y.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of U-Haul, click here.
Allegations: Misleadingly representing that it safeguards consumers’ personal information when it failed to do so and there was a data breach
Allegations: Falsely representing that U-Haul guarantees it will pay $50 to any customers who, after making reservations, do not receive the correct equipment size, location, or pick-up time
2017: A state court judge certified a class of U-Haul customers who rented vehicles. 2011: A class-action lawsuit was filed against U-Haul Co. of West Virginia for allegedly misleadingly giving…
TINA.org looks into the math behind company’s environmental claim.
How a $19.95 rental can cost you more than $60.
That $19.95 figure you see on some U-Haul vans and trucks is only the beginning of your financial journey.