
U-Haul Rentals
Allegations: Misleadingly representing that it safeguards consumers’ personal information when it failed to do so and there was a data breach
Swanson et al. v. U-Haul Internationa, Inc. and U-Haul Co. of Illinois, Inc.
13-L-482, Illinois state court – Kane County
(2013)
U-Haul truck rentals
Deceptively increasing the advertised price of rentals by way of its gasoline return policy
Failing to adequately disclose the terms and conditions of its gasoline return policy when consumers rent vehicles
Order granting arbitration affirmed
Allegations: Misleadingly representing that it safeguards consumers’ personal information when it failed to do so and there was a data breach
Allegations: Falsely representing that U-Haul will pay $50 to customers who, after making reservations, do not receive the agreed upon equipment size, location, or pick up time
Allegations: Falsely representing that U-Haul guarantees it will pay $50 to any customers who, after making reservations, do not receive the correct equipment size, location, or pick-up time
2017: A state court judge certified a class of U-Haul customers who rented vehicles. 2011: A class-action lawsuit was filed against U-Haul Co. of West Virginia for allegedly misleadingly giving…
TINA.org looks into the math behind company’s environmental claim.
How a $19.95 rental can cost you more than $60.
That $19.95 figure you see on some U-Haul vans and trucks is only the beginning of your financial journey.