Truth In Advertising - Logo

Class Action

U-Haul’s Reservation Guarantee Policy

Class Action

U-Haul’s Reservation Guarantee Policy

Share

June 2020: This case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. because the parties reached a settlement agreement, the terms of which have not been disclosed.

May 2018: A class-action lawsuit was filed against U-Haul for allegedly falsely representing its reservation guarantee policy. Specifically, plaintiffs claim that, if a customer makes reservations and does not receive the agreed upon equipment size, location, or pick up time, U-Haul will pay the customer $50 when, according to the complaint, the company often fails to pay the $50 when the correct equipment is not available at the specified time and location. (Newman et al v. U-Haul Co. of New York and Vermont, Inc., U-Haul International, Inc., and Amerco, Case No. 18-cv-4751, S.D.N.Y.)

For more of TINA.org’s coverage of U-Haul, click here.

Legal Action

U-Haul

U-Haul

TINA.org found U-Haul engaged in deceptive price advertising and fee scheme.

Class-Action Tracker

U-Haul

Class Action

U-Haul

Allegations: Deceptively increasing the advertised price of rentals by way of its gasoline return policy and failing to adequately disclose the terms and conditions of the policy

U-Haul Rentals

Class Action

U-Haul Rentals

Allegations: Misleadingly representing that it safeguards consumers’ personal information when it failed to do so and there was a data breach

U-Haul’s Reservation Guarantee

Class Action

U-Haul’s Reservation Guarantee

Allegations: Falsely representing that U-Haul guarantees it will pay $50 to any customers who, after making reservations, do not receive the correct equipment size, location, or pick-up time

The Latest

Filters