Viator’s Free Cancellation Claims
This is not a sitewide perk.
In May 2014, a federal judge dismissed a class-action lawsuit against Toys “R” Us because the parties reached a settlement. The complaint, which was originally filed in 2012, alleged that Toys “R” Us offered a “free gift” to consumers who purchased items through its website when, in reality, there was no free gift or the free gift was not of the advertised value. At this time, we do not know the terms of the settlement. Plaintiffs can reopen the action if the settlement is not completed within 60 days. (Probert et al v. Toys “R” Us, Inc., Case No. 12-cv-07237, D. NJ.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits against Toys “R” Us and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
This is not a sitewide perk.
These players dropped the ball in their recent offseason announcements.
Refunds for consumers duped into signing up for “VIP” memberships.
Rosewater ingredient claims wilt upon a closer look.
What does this marketing term mean?