Starbucks Decaffeinated Coffees
Allegations: Falsely marketing that the company respects human rights and uses sustainable practices
Walsh et al. v. Starbucks Corp.
26-cv-3745, W.D. Wash.
(Oct. 2026)
Starbucks protein beverages
Falsely marketing products as sugar-free when one serving contains approximately 13 to 21 grams of sugar due to the lactose content
Pending
Allegations: Falsely marketing that the company respects human rights and uses sustainable practices
Allegations: Beverages do not contain the fruits advertised in the product name
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as “100% Arabica Coffee” when they contain added potassium
Allegations: Misleadingly representing that cocoa has been harvested following ethical and environmentally responsible standards
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing bagels as “Sprouted Grain” when they are made primarily with non-sprouted grains
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as healthy, safe, and high quality without disclosing that they may contain harmful bacteria
Allegations: Coffee products contain fewer servings than advertised
Allegations: Falsely advertising that the flavor comes from vanilla when the ingredients list shows that the flavor comes from unspecified “Natural Flavor”
Lawsuit tells a different story about the treatment of workers on Starbucks’ source farms.
See how you stack up.
Courts weigh in on legal term.
Stocking stuffer alert: These “white chocolate” treats are allegedly missing key ingredients.
Class-action complaint alleges “Doubleshot” drinks have less than two shots of espresso.