Starbucks Decaffeinated Coffees
Allegations: Falsely marketing that the company respects human rights and uses sustainable practices
Walsh et al. v. Starbucks Corp.
26-cv-3745, W.D. Wash.
(Oct. 2026)
Starbucks protein beverages
Falsely marketing products as sugar-free when one serving contains approximately 13 to 21 grams of sugar due to the lactose content
Pending
Allegations: Falsely marketing that the company respects human rights and uses sustainable practices
Allegations: Beverages do not contain the fruits advertised in the product name
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as “100% Arabica Coffee” when they contain added potassium
Allegations: Misleadingly representing that cocoa has been harvested following ethical and environmentally responsible standards
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing bagels as “Sprouted Grain” when they are made primarily with non-sprouted grains
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as healthy, safe, and high quality without disclosing that they may contain harmful bacteria
Allegations: Coffee products contain fewer servings than advertised
Allegations: Falsely advertising that the flavor comes from vanilla when the ingredients list shows that the flavor comes from unspecified “Natural Flavor”
The in-store presence of Pokémon prompts TINA.org inquiry about possible marketing agreements.
How much is really in there?
Survey says: Don’t take this survey.
Consumers sour on milk after learning of additives in Starbucks coconut product.
Does McDonald’s beverage met the FDA definition of white chocolate?