Williams-Sonoma to Pay $3 Million for Violating Made in USA Order
Record-setting settlement comes after TINA.org complaint.
Sezzle’s Buy Now, Pay Later Services
Case Name (Date)
Sliwa et al. v. Sezzle Inc.
22-cv-3055, C.D. Cal.
(May 2022)
Sliwa et al. v. Sezzle Inc.
22-cv-6093, C.D. Cal.
(July 2022)
Product/Service
Sezzle’s Buy Now, Pay Later services
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing that Sezzle is a free service with no fees, interest or other catches without adequately warning users of the risk that banks processing Sezzle payments will charge them multiple overdraft fees
Status
Sliwa Case (No. 22-cv-3055): Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
Sliwa Case (No. 22-cv-6093): Settled
(Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.)
The Latest
Arby’s ‘Wagyu’ Burgers
Ground your beef expectations.
SEC Sues OnPassive Alleging It’s a Pyramid Scheme
Lawsuit claims company defrauded over 800,000 investors of more than $108 million.
FTC and State AGs Need to Take Their Relationship to the Next Level
TINA.org files comment concerning coordinated efforts to protect consumers.
TINA.org Raises Major Red Flags with Roblox Class-Action Settlement
How millions of kids will lose their rights to be properly refunded for their losses.