Class Action

Samsung Galaxy Gear S Smartwatch

Class Action

Samsung Galaxy Gear S Smartwatch

February 2018: A federal judge granted in part and denied in part Samsung’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint, dismissing the New Jersey consumer fraud state law claims finding that Georgia law applies to plaintiffs’ claims, and dismissing unjust enrichment claims finding that there was not a direct relationship between plaintiffs and Samsung. Plaintiffs’ other claims will move forward and the judge gave plaintiffs leave to amend their consumer fraud claims under Georgia law.

June 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Samsung for allegedly falsely advertising the Samsung Galaxy Gear S Smartwatch as having a battery that would last 24 to 48 hours without being charged when, according to plaintiffs, the battery dies after about 4 hours of normal use. (Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in June 2017.) (Noble et al v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Case No. 15-cv-3713, D.N.J.)

For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Samsung and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.

 


Class-Action Tracker

www.samsung.com

Class Action

www.samsung.com

Allegations: Misrepresenting that the website does not collect data from visitors who disable tracking cookies or disclose their data to third parties

Samsung’s Black Stainless Steel Kitchen Appliances

Class Action

Samsung’s Black Stainless Steel Kitchen Appliances

Allegations: Falsely marketing appliances as “fingerprint resistant” and failing to disclose that “black stainless steel” is actually regular stainless steel with a black coating that flakes and peels off

Samsung’s Black Stainless Steel Appliances

Class Action

Samsung’s Black Stainless Steel Appliances

Allegations: Misleadingly advertising the black stainless steel finish on appliances as durable when the finish is a thin plastic coating that is prone to peel, chip and flake


The Latest

Filters


Show More