On Shoes
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
Salesforce.com Subscriptions
March 2017: This action was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
February 2017: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Salesforce.com for allegedly failing to adequately disclose the terms of subscriptions for customer support software products. According to the complaint, the company offers automatic renewal and continuous service offers without adequately disclosing the terms of such offers resulting in customers being charged without their consent. (Lira et al v. Salesforce.com, Inc. and Does 1-10, Case No. BC651386, Superior Court for the State of California – County of Los Angeles)
For more information about negative option offers, click here.
The Latest
Junk Fees at JFK, LaGuardia and Newark Airports
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?
FTC Takes TruHeight’s Growth Claims Down a Few Pegs
Supplement maker agrees to pay $750K to settle deceptive health claims lawsuit.
FTC Cracks Down on Forever Living Following Years of Deception
Settlement comes after TINA.org exposed thousands of deceptive income claims.
What You Should Know about Home Projectors
TINA.org sheds light on confusing and misleading brightness claims.