Wine at Safeway Grocery Stores
Allegations: Falsely advertising discounts off of artificially inflated reference prices and as available for a limited time
August 2017: The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s judgment. For more information about this case, go to http://www.safewaygrocerydeliveryclassaction.com/home.
December 2015: Safeway filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the November 2015 judgment.
November 2015: A federal judge entered a judgement in favor of the certified class and awarded them nearly $42 million. Class members will receive refunds and are estimated to receive approximately 89% of the online price markup charged.
August 2015: A federal judge granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment awarding damages in the amount of the online price markup to class members.
May 2015: The named plaintiff’s individual statutory claims were voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
February 2015: A federal judge granted plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment for the breach of contract claim finding that Safeway breached the contracts by charging customers more than the contract terms authorized.
2011: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Safeway for allegedly misleadingly promising that customers who place orders online will pay the same prices as customers who shop in stores when, according to plaintiffs, customers who buy online will pay approximately ten percent more for items on the store’s website. (Rodman et al v. Safeway, Inc., Case No. 11-cv-3003, N. D. CA.)
Allegations: Falsely advertising discounts off of artificially inflated reference prices and as available for a limited time
Allegations: Falsely advertising discounts off of artificially inflated reference prices
Allegations: Failing to disclose products contain the carcinogen benzene
Allegations: Misleading promotions for “free” products
Allegations: Marketing that consumers who purchase items during promotions get “free” products when the store increases the price of the first product during promotions
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as compostable
Allegations: Deceptively using slack-filled boxes
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as “Rapid Release”
Allegations: Charging customers higher prices than those represented at the time of checkout
Allegations: Failing to disclose baby foods contain toxic heavy metals
March 2018: A state judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement. October 2017: A state judge preliminarily approved a settlement of this lawsuit. According to the settlement terms, class…
November 2014: This case was voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which have not been disclosed. The named plaintiff’s individual claims were dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it…
May 2017: This action was voluntarily dismissed after the parties reached a settlement agreement. The agreement does not provide monetary relief to class members and indicates that Safeway has applied…
January 2015: A federal judge dismissed the named plaintiff’s individual claims When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. because the parties reached a settlement agreement. The…
October 2015: This action was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. because the parties reached a settlement agreement. The settlement terms have not…