
Ring Video Doorbells Sold on Amazon.com
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that the doorbell’s battery lasts between 6 and 12 months when the battery actually lasts less than 2 months
Foster et al v. Ring, LLC
21-cv-2175, C.D. Cal.
(March 2021)
Ring Security System
Misleadingly representing that the company safeguards users’ private information when it does not take adequate steps to stop hackers and actively shares users’ personal data without consent
Pending
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that the doorbell’s battery lasts between 6 and 12 months when the battery actually lasts less than 2 months
Allegations: Failing to adequately disclose that consumers need to pay additional money to get certain key features
Class-action lawsuits allege these snacks are graham crackers in name only.
Company recharges its batteries following FTC inquiry into its made in the USA claims.
TINA.org finds gaps in orthodontic startup’s marketing.
Courts weigh in on legal term.
TINA.org reader calls out promotion for cruise lines’ CHEERS! beverage program.