January/February 2017: A state judge granted final approval of the settlement.
June 2016: A state judge preliminarily approved a settlement of a lawsuit alleging that Vitamin Shoppe makes false and misleading statements on the labels of and in advertisements for Reservie Trans-Resveratrol regarding its lawfulness, composition, and ingredients, in violation of California law. According to the settlement terms, class members may receive a refund ranging from $17 to $25, depending on the total number of valid claims submitted. In addition, the company agreed to revise the product labels to more clearly disclose that the product contains polygonum cuspidatum (Japanese Knotweed) by listing the ingredient in the Supplement Facts panel on the label. The final fairness hearing is scheduled for January 26, 2017. (Scheuerman et al v. Vitamin Shoppe Industries, Inc. d/b/a Vitamin Shoppe, Inc., Case No. BC592773, California Superior Court – Los Angeles)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Vitamin Shoppe and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
Allegations: Falsely marketing that dietary supplements help “weight management” and “appetite control” when scientific evidence shows that the active ingredients are incapable of providing weight-loss benefits
A class-action lawsuit was filed against Vitamin Shoppe for allegedly misleadingly marketing its Garcinia Cambogia Extract. According to the complaint, Vitamin Shoppe markets the product as a dietary supplement that…
In May 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Vitamin Shoppe for allegedly falsely advertising that its Garcinia Cambogia Extract dietary supplement effectively aids in “weight management” and “appetite control”…
In February 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Vitamin Shoppe alleging that its St. John’s Wort Extract dietary supplement did not contain the amounts of standardized extract hypericin (the…
September 2017: Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint making similar allegations (i.e., that labels misleadingly state the total number of units in the container without adequately disclosing that one serving is…
February 2014: A federal judge dismissed this action When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. because the plaintiff did not file an amended complaint within 30…
August 2015: This action was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled. because the parties reached a settlement, the terms…
September 2013: This action was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. as to the named plaintiff’s claims and When a complaint is dismissed without…
August 2014: The named plaintiff voluntarily dismissed this action When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.. The reasons have not been…
May 2013: The named plaintiff voluntarily dismissed this action When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.. The reasons have not been…
Regulators send united message about deceptively marketed supplements.