July 2017: This case was stayed pending a global settlement in a related Missouri state court case. For more information about the settlement in the Missouri case, click here.
May 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Dynamic Pet Products and Frick’s Meat Products, Inc. for allegedly misleadingly marketing the Real Ham Bone For Dogs as an appropriate and safe chew toy for dogs when the bone is actually dangerous and many dogs have suffered serious injury and death as a result of chewing the toy. (Reed et al v. Dynamic Pet Products and Frick’s Meat Products, Inc., Case No. 15-cv-987, S. D. CA.).
For more information about the misleading marketing of pet products and TINA.org’s coverage of them, click here.
August 2017: A state judge granted final approval of the settlement. April 2017: A state judge preliminarily approved a settlement of a false advertising class-action lawsuit against Dynamic Pet Products.…
In March 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Dynamic Pet Products and Frick’s Meat Products for allegedly marketing its Real Ham Bone For Dogs as an appropriate and safe…
Rina Raphael, Los Angeles Times
Organization reportedly shared information with tech companies for marketing purposes.
Are these gaming glasses really ‘clinically proven’ to improve sleep?
MADISON, CONN. August 9, 2022 — An increasing number of celebrities are jumping on the NFT bandwagon, showcasing their digital assets on social media for the world to see. But are…
Katie Notopoulos, BuzzFeed News