Fairlife Milk
Company’s animal welfare claims – and brand name – face increasing scrutiny.
Childress et al. v. Prosper Funding, LLC
25-cv-9286, N.D. Cal.
(Oct. 2025)
Huff et al. v. Prosper Funding, LLC
25-cv-9162, N.D. Cal.
(Oct. 2025)
MacDonald et al. v. Prosper Funding, LLC
25-cv-9493, N.D. Cal.
(Nov. 2025)
McPhee et al. v. Prosper Funding, LLC
25-cv-7947, N.D. Cal.
(Sept. 2025)
Moultrie et al. v. Prosper Funding, LLC
25-cv-9101, N.D. Cal.
(Oct. 2025)
Rivera et al. v. Prosper Funding LLC et al.
25-cv-9133, N.D. Cal.
(Oct. 2025)
Shaw et al. v. Prosper Funding LLC
25-cv-9103, N.D. Cal.
(Oct. 2025)
Soto et al. v. Prosper Funding LLC and Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
25-cv-10199, N.D. Cal.
(Nov. 2025)
Sullivan et al. v. Prosper Funding, LLC and Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
25-cv-8232, N.D. Cal.
(Sept. 2025)
Taylor et al. v. Prosper Funding, LLC and Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
25-cv-9278, N.D. Cal.
(Oct. 2025)
Waltson et al. v. Prosper Funding, LLC
25-cv-7949, N.D. Cal.
(Sept. 2025)
Yoder et al. v. Prosper Funding LLC
25-cv-7972, N.D. Cal.
(Sept. 2025)
Prosper Funding
Misrepresenting that it protects consumers’ personal information when it failed to do so and there was a data breach
Pending
Company’s animal welfare claims – and brand name – face increasing scrutiny.
Consumers balk at hidden junk fees.
As years pass and life shifts, the walls around us quietly hold every moment.
TINA.org uncovers the limits of this carrier’s “unlimited” data plans.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.