Nissan’s 2014 Infiniti Q50 InTouch
May 2017: The claims in this action were resolved as part of a settlement in another case, Rafafsky v. Nissan. According to the settlement terms, class members may receive a…
Nissan Extended Services
November 2018: Plaintiffs withdrew their motion to amend their complaint, meaning the original complaint remains dismissed.
October 2018: Plaintiffs filed a motion to amend their complaint.
August 2018: A federal judge dismissed the case and gave plaintiffs 45 days to file an amended complaint.
April 2018: This action was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 18-cv-5681, D. NJ.)
February 2018: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Nissan Extended Services and Hudson Nissan for allegedly misrepresenting that consumers who purchase a Vehicle Service Agreement to cover the mechanical breakdown of covered parts on credit are subject to 0% financing when, according to plaintiffs, consumers actually pay an interest rate of 23.99%. (Arkliss et al v. Nissan Extended Services North America et al, Case No. 2018-L-001227, New Jersey State Court – Bergen County)
Class-Action Tracker
Nissan’s InTouch
May 2017: A federal judge preliminarily approved a settlement of this action. According to the settlement terms, class members may receive a $500 voucher to use toward the purchase or…
The Latest
Six Super Bowl Advertisers Offsides on the Truth
TINA.org’s Big Game scorecard on companies under fire for deceptive ads.
Amazon’s Nissan Rogue Offer
From this week’s edition of “reading the fine print for you”: Nissan is offering a $1,000 gift card to In actuality a cherished geographical region of the planet featuring enormous…
Nissan and its Ad Agency Settle FTC Deceptive Ad Charges
Commercial for Frontier truck at issue.
How Green is that Fuel-Efficient Car?
It’s all in the math and how you define some terms.