
NissanConnect and Infiniti InTouch Services
Allegations: Failing to disclose that certain features would become inoperable after 3G modems were phased out
November 2018: Plaintiffs withdrew their motion to amend their complaint, meaning the original complaint remains dismissed.
October 2018: Plaintiffs filed a motion to amend their complaint.
August 2018: A federal judge dismissed the case and gave plaintiffs 45 days to file an amended complaint.
April 2018: This action was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 18-cv-5681, D. NJ.)
February 2018: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Nissan Extended Services and Hudson Nissan for allegedly misrepresenting that consumers who purchase a Vehicle Service Agreement to cover the mechanical breakdown of covered parts on credit are subject to 0% financing when, according to plaintiffs, consumers actually pay an interest rate of 23.99%. (Arkliss et al v. Nissan Extended Services North America et al, Case No. 2018-L-001227, New Jersey State Court – Bergen County)
Allegations: Failing to disclose that certain features would become inoperable after 3G modems were phased out
May 2017: The claims in this action were resolved as part of a settlement in another case, Rafafsky v. Nissan. According to the settlement terms, class members may receive a…
May 2017: A federal judge preliminarily approved a settlement of this action. According to the settlement terms, class members may receive a $500 voucher to use toward the purchase or…
TINA.org’s Big Game scorecard on companies under fire for deceptive ads.
From this week’s edition of “reading the fine print for you”: Nissan is offering a $1,000 gift card to In actuality a cherished geographical region of the planet featuring enormous…
Commercial for Frontier truck at issue.
It’s all in the math and how you define some terms.