LuLaRoe
TINA.org found MLM famous for its leggings violated a court order by using atypical income claims.
LuLaRoe’s Return Policies
Case Name (Date)
Patton et al. v. LuLaRoe, LLC et al.
17-v-2231, C.D. Cal.
(Nov. 2017)
Lemberg et al. v. LuLaRoe, LLC et al.
17-cv-2102, C.D. Cal.
(Oct. 2017)
Product/Service
LuLaRoe business opportunity and clothing
Allegations
Operating an illegal pyramid scheme that primarily rewards recruiting new participants
Making false and misleading income claims about consultants’ ability to earn substantial income and achieve financial freedom
Misrepresenting and failing to honor its return and refund policies
Status
Patton case: Dismissed; named plaintiff joined the Lemberg case
Lemberg case: Individual claims sent to arbitration; case voluntarily dismissed
Legal Action
Class-Action Tracker
LuLaRoe Pyramid Scheme Allegations
Allegations: Pyramid scheme allegations
LuLaRoe Pyramid Scheme Claim
Allegations: Pyramid scheme allegations
LuLaRoe Pyramid Scheme Claims
Allegations: Failing to disclose that it operates an illegal pyramid scheme
The Latest
LuLaRich or LuLaRuined?
New documentary explores the rise and fall of LuLaRoe.
How LuLaRoe Made Its Founders Rich While So Many Others Went Bankrupt
Megan Carpentier, Oxygen
The Cost of Doing Business
Comparing the amount companies agree to pay to settle deceptive marketing charges with their annual revenue.
LuLa-NO: Clothing MLM Violating Court Order
TINA.org alerts Washington AG’s office to deceptive income claims and more.
LuLaRoe to Pay $4.75 Million to Settle Pyramid Allegations
Settlement avoids a trial that had been scheduled to begin on Feb 16.