May 2015: The named-plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the complaint without prejudice. The reasons for the dismissal have not yet been disclosed.
February 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against LifeLock, Inc. for, among other things, allegedly deceptively making automatic renewal and continuous service offers without adequately disclosing the terms for such offers. (Trax et al v. LifeLock, Inc., Case No. 15-cv-00220, S. D. CA.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against LifeLock and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding automatic renewal offers and TINA.org’s coverage of the topic, click here.
In March 2018, a class-action lawsuit was filed against LifeLock for allegedly falsely advertising its identity theft protection services. Specifically, the complaint alleges that LifeLock promises to protect, notify, reimburse,…
September 2017: Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the August 2017 order. August 2017: A federal judge granted the company’s motion to dismiss the complaint finding, among other things,…
October 2016: More objectors filed Notices of Appeal regarding the approval of the settlement. Click on the information below to see them. Carrasco Notice of Appeal Cochran Notice of Appeal…
February 2016: A state judge granted final approval of the settlement. July 2015: A state judge preliminarily approved a settlement of a deceptive advertising class-action lawsuit filed against LifeLock. Among…
Comparing the amount companies agree to pay to settle deceptive marketing charges with their annual revenue.
Experts weigh in on how to avoid being a victim of these latest campus scams.
LifeLock’s ads say the company will relentlessly protect your identity. But how much can they really do?
As heard on Sirius XM: Lifelock tells us that “Don” became the victim of identity theft and ran into trouble at home and at work. But Lifelock doesn’t mention…