MyIQ.com
A hidden subscription is just the start.
John Paul Mitchell Hair Products
Case Name (Date)
Howell et al. v. John Paul Mitchell Systems
26-cv-4519, N.D. Cal.
(Feb. 2026)
Product/Service
John Paul Mitchell hair products
Allegations
Falsely marketing that products are never tested on animals and 100% cruelty-free when the company allows animal testing on numerous products
Status
Pending
The Latest
How Ethos Sold Wall Street on AI While Powering an Analog Boiler Room
Jenny Ahn, Michelle Cera, Ruth Reader, Hunterbrook
CATrends: Unscented Deodorants and Antiperspirants
Lawsuits allege marketing doesn’t pass the smell test.
HydroJug’s Heat-Retention Claims
Can these bottles really keep drinks hot for up to six hours?
With Personalized Pricing, Disclosure Is a Start, But Not a Finish Line
TINA.org and other consumer advocates file comment with FTC.