There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Clemente et al. v. Jocko Fuel, LLC
26-cv-659, S.D.N.Y.
(Jan. 2026)
Jocko Mölk Chocolate Protein Shake
Misleadingly marketing products as providing “clean fuel” and meeting “unbeatable standards” without disclosing that they are contaminated, or are at risk of being contaminated, with cadmium
Pending
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.