Huggies Natural Care Baby Wipes

November 2018: The case was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. because the parties reached a settlement agreement, the terms of which have not been disclosed.

February 2018: This case was consolidated with Haris v. Kimberly-Clark. Later in February, plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint making similar allegations.

March 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Kimberly-Clark for allegedly falsely advertising its Huggies Natural Care Baby Wipes as “natural,” “gentle,” “hypoallergenic,” and made with the “simplest formula for a gentle clean” when the wipes actually contain non-natural, synthetic, and chemical ingredients. (Sebastian et al v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., Kimberly Clark Worldwide, Inc., and Kimberly-Clark Global Sales, LLC, Case No. 17-cv-442, S. D. CA.)

For more information about natural claims and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.

Class-Action Tracker

Huggies Simply Clean Fragrance Free Baby Wipes

Class Action

Huggies Simply Clean Fragrance Free Baby Wipes

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as clean, gentle, safe, hypoallergenic, and plant-based

Huggies Simply Clean Fragrance Free Baby Wipes

Class Action

Huggies Simply Clean Fragrance Free Baby Wipes

Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain or are at risk of containing harmful per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)

Huggies Diapers

Class Action

Huggies Diapers

Allegations: Deceptively marketing diapers as safe when they contain a skin irritant

Huggies Natural Care Baby Wipes

Class Action

Huggies Natural Care Baby Wipes

Allegations: Falsely marketing wipes as “plant-based”

Huggies Snug & Dry

Class Action

Huggies Snug & Dry

Allegations: Misleadingly advertising diapers as safe and gentle without disclosing that they may cause rashes, blistering, peeling, and chemical burns

Huggies Snug & Dry Diapers