Lens.com
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.
Barber et al. v. Hot Topic, Inc. d/b/a Hot Topic and BoxLunch, Torrid LLC
24-cv-9215, C.D. Cal.
(Oct. 2024)
Dominguez et al. v. Hot Topic, Inc. d/b/a Hot Topic, and BoxLunch, and Torrid, LLC
24-cv-11109, C.D. Cal.
(Dec. 2024)
Garcia et al. v. Hot Topic, Inc. d/b/a Hot Topic and BoxLunch
24-cv-9856, C.D. Cal.
(Nov. 2024)
Garrett et al. v. Hot Topic, Inc. d/b/a Hot Topic d/b/a Box Lunch, Torrid, LLC and Snowflake, Inc.
24-cv-182, D. Mont.
(Nov. 2024)
Garrett et al. v. Hot Topic, Inc. d/b/a Hot Topic and BoxLunch, Torrid, LLC
24-cv-9884, C.D. Cal.
(Nov. 2024)
Marshall et al. v. Hot Topic, Inc. d/b/a Hot Topic and BoxLunch, Torrid, LLC
24-cv-9983, C.D. Cal.
(Nov. 2024)
Roberson et al. v. Hot Topic, Inc. d/b/a Hot Topic and BoxLunch, and Snowflake, Inc.
24-cv-10772, C.D. Cal.
(Dec. 2024)
Sides et al. v. Hot Topic, Inc. d/b/a Hot Topic and BoxLunch, Torrid, LLC
24-cv-9911, C.D. Cal.
(Nov. 2024)
Weatherford et al. v. Hot Topic, Inc. d/b/a Hot Topic and BoxLunch, Torrid, LLC
24-cv-9805, C.D. Cal.
(Nov. 2024)
Hot Topic
Misrepresenting that it protects consumers’ personal information when it failed to do so and there was a data breach in October 2024
Barber case: Pending
Dominguez case: Pending
Garcia case: Pending
Garrett case (No. 24-cv-182): Pending
Garrett case (No. 24-cv-9884): Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
Marshall case: Pending
Roberson case: Pending
Sides case: Pending
Weatherford case: Pending
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?
Supplement maker agrees to pay $750K to settle deceptive health claims lawsuit.
Settlement comes after TINA.org exposed thousands of deceptive income claims.